More Questions About Peter Parker

There are a few smaller decisions about Peter Parker’s character that the next Spider-Man writers may touch on. Although it’s just as easy to ignore completely most of the time.

The Parents


On his now-deleted formspring account, Dan Slott was asked about Spider-Man moments he disliked. He brought up the revelation from Parallel Lives that Mary Jane had always known who Spider-Man was, as well as Spider-Man’s victory over Firelord from Amazing Spider-Man #270. But the cited one moment from the Silver Age.

When we found out that Peter Parker’s parents were secretly spies.

Even though Stan “The Man” Lee came up with this, I’m not crazy about it (blasphemy, I know!). To me, Peter Parker is an “everyman.” Yes he’s was a super-genius kid from Queens… But chances are you’ve met or known a very clever person in your lifetime– maybe even from Queens. But the second you add, “And his parents were secretly spies,” to me THAT’S where Peter Parker’s life stops being about “the world outside your window” and more about a crazy comic book character’s adventures. Does that make sense?

I don’t particularly care for that either, but as far as I can tell, there’s really nothing that can be done about it. Spider-Man’s parents are usually ignored, although the mystery about what happened to them became the central arc of Marc Webb’s Amazing Spider-Man reboot. But any attempt to retcon this aspect of the comics is bound to be horribly convoluted.

As an aside, on CBR there was a boomlet of speculation that the major development in Amazing Spider-Man #700 may somehow involve Peter’s parents. I doubt it’s going to happen, but there was chatter about it.

etc 2Sports

Spider-Man should definitely be a Mets fan. There isn’t any elaboration needed here.

Pop Culture

The average comic book reader and comic book writer will have spent a lot of time consuming pop culture, so there is the temptation to include all sorts of reference to films, television and music in Peter Parker’s dialogue. I don’t know if that’s the right tack for Spider-Man. This is a guy who is going to be enormously busy, so I don’t think he’s spent a lot of time watching television or listening to music. He won’t have time to read Rolling Stone and shop for albums.

So his musical references would consist of a few hit singles, stuff he liked before he was bitten by a radioactive spider and gifts from friends and family. I think his favorite TV shows would be those with self-contained episodes (The SimpsonsLaw and Order) as opposed to longer intricate narratives (Breaking Bad, The Wire). There are probably quite a few films that he always meant to watch, but never got around to. He would feel the same way about books. The one thing he would find time for is science related stuff, although he would probably be a few weeks behind on NPR’s Science Friday podcast and various magazines.

Organic Webbing

The debate about whether Spider-Man should have organic webbing or mechanical webbing seems to be settled. In the Raimi/ Maguire films, the webbing was just one of the many powers Peter Parker gained, like his spider-sense and ability to scale walls. Sam Raimi suggested that it was unrealistic for an ordinary teenager to develop such an impressive product, so his Peter Parker didn’t invent mechanical webbing.

Spider-Man later gained organic webbing in the comics, and I considered whether it was hypocritical of former Marvel Editor in Chief Joe Quesada to support organic webbing while criticizing the spider-marriage. It was undone after One More Day, which isn’t something fans seem upset about. Sometimes fans are bothered by the way no explanation has ever been provided, but I don’t think that’s a story worth telling at the moment. Perhaps if there’s ever another sequel to One More Day, it could be touched on.

Currently, organic webbing would be completely pointless in the regular comics. All it does is make Peter Parker’s life easier, by removing the complications of developing mechanical webbing. We know that he invented mechanical webbing, so the reader would still be aware that the character was an unusually smart teenager. The Peter Parker of the Amazing Spider-Man film series uses mechanical webbing, so it’s a moot point anyway.

It has also been observed that the point that a biologically accurate version of organic webbing would be different from what we’re used to. Artist Kerry Callen demonstrated this in a parody of the classic cover of Amazing Fantasy #15.

etc 3

Taking Sports Seriously

My last name is Mets, so I have selfish reasons for liking Paul Jenkins’s take on Peter Parker as a fan of the New York Mets. But it’s something that fits the character considering the team’s complex reputation. I also like that Peter associates the team with his Uncle Ben. He wasn’t a fan of other teams or other sports as a child, and he wouldn’t have the time to develop an interest after the spider bite.

The Teetotaler

One small thing that’s bothered me is the occasional references to Peter Parker being a teetotaler who can’t hold his liquor. It seems to me that the main reason for this to preserve the character as a role model for younger children. So he’s the one character in comics who explicitly does not drink. But as most adults do sometimes imbibe, it makes it slightly more difficult to relate to Peter Parker if there’s one thing about him that makes him a bit weird. And the option of getting the character drunk would be advantageous for the writers and the artists, as an excuse for sometimes necessary plot-induced stupidity.

But for the most part, it’s just something that can be ignored.

The Infinite Spider-Man is a series of mini-essays regarding Marvel’s options for the future of the best character in comics.


About Thomas Mets

I’m a comic book fan, wannabe writer, politics buff and New Yorker. I don’t actually follow baseball. In the Estonian language, “Mets” simply means forest, or lousy sports team. You can email me at
This entry was posted in Pop-Culture Trends, Spider-Man and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to More Questions About Peter Parker

  1. John Besas says:

    Really old, I know. But Simply put, everything comes from his mantra that with great power comes great responsibility. He doesn’t want to lose control of himself and possibly hurt someone because he already does that enough while sober (while still managing to give us many amazing story arcs), but it’s one of the things that makes him so special to readers. You don’t have to be inebriated to make incredibly dumb decisions.

    Parker actually has a list of mandatory character traits and one of them requires that he doesn’t abuse alcohol. So he actually can drink responsibly. Although it would still be pointless because nothing interesting will ever come out of that when it comes to him. His identity as a teetotaler is already set in stone. The topic of drinking is so rarely touched upon in Spider-Man comics anyway that people don’t even think about it when reading them. After all, who would read comics with a mindset focused on substance consumption or lack thereof? However, people will notice changes.

    There was that one issue in which MJ returned to Peter’s life after a long hiatus, and writers decided to make Peter handle the situation by getting himself drunk just to talk to her. Fans were irritated to the point they contacted Marvel to discuss the issue and why it strays so far from what makes Peter, well… Peter. Marvel responded by stating that Peter thought he was drinking alcohol, although he really wasn’t and was only affected because of the placebo effect. Regardless, it completely strayed from his character. The fans (drinkers and non-drinkers alike) know who Peter is and appreciate him for it. It only made sense to defend what they love, even if some of them aren’t exactly in line with his own views.

    The amount of superheroes who do imbibe outnumber the ones who don’t, just like in real life. For those who do know about his non-drinking habits and have made the same choice, they would not have as much support and representation if it wasn’t for him. He’s also one of the very few they have that gives them something to believe in, so let them have their fun. There’s nothing out there that satisfies everyone. No two people are ever the same either, so it’s best to accept and respect their lifestyle choices and not think less of them as if their decision not to consume a liquid defines their worth, especially if they aren’t even hurting anyone in any way. If you want a Spider-Man that drinks, look to Ben Reilly or Kaine.

    Just don’t make your character be or do something to meet a quota. Make your character a drinker if that’s how you want to express yourself through your art. Also, don’t give a character a trait that he didn’t have before “because it’s 2016” or because “most people do it”, especially if that character wasn’t your creation. Have an original thought. Don’t bastardize someone else’s art to cash in on social norms and movements.

  2. John Besas says:

    Oh yeah, and I forgot to mention where I’m commenting on this site.

    More Questions About Peter Parker
    Posted on December 11, 2012

    “The Teetotaler”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s